Category Archives: Shale oil

Day of Reckoning

Respected consultants RBN Energy held a conference last week in Houston, partnering with engineering company Turner, Mason & Company. The conference theme was “Surviving the Flood” - examining the reality that there is too much crude oil coming into the US Gulf Coast refiners.

By all accounts, the conference was very good. The “day of reckoning” as one speaker called it, was coming some time in the next few years, when the flood of crude oil coming from shale production as well as from conventional domestic drilling would force the price of crude oil to be discounted by as much as $15-$20 per barrel.

According to RBN and TMC, there are several factors at work which will have a bearing on when this day of reckoning arrives. Production and transportation of crude to continue to increase, refining capacity to not grow, and whether US laws restricting the export of crude oil are lifted.

But as Stuart Ehrenreich of Cascade Resources & Consulting pointed out to me by email, some exports are already allowed. ”What most folks don’t realize is that swaps ARE ALLOWED under certain circumstances. It actually is quietly being done now.”

There’s no doubt that the increased domestic production has caused a commensurate drop in imports of crude oil, but there are some vested interests at play in the import game. PDVSA (Venezuela) and PEMEX (Mexico) own some refining assets in the Gulf, and will continue to insist on using their own oil, as will Saudi Arabia who own some Motiva assets.

The expression “Day of Reckoning” does seem a little melodramatic. Some prices are already being discounted, for instance the price that Saudi Arabia charges the USA compared to the price they charge in Europe. The idea of an event occurring in a day is great for headlines, but short of a “black swan” event it is more likely to be a gradual deterioration of the situation. Will there be some sort of tipping point? Unlikely.

Still, it is good to see the industry starting to address the key questions and consequences, though we are still to see an adequate embrace of the question of petcoke outcomes in this new world of shale oil. The oil industry is not going to address the needs of the aluminium industry, but the aluminium industry has also not yet come to grips with what is happening to one of its key raw materials.

 

 

Is it a bubble or a paradigm shift? Does it matter?

That’s a question that can’t be answered fully for a couple of years yet. But the peak oil theory enthusiasts are already claiming that shale oil is nothing more than a blip on the radar screen. Meanwhile, others are taking this view to task.

John Kemp, one of Reuters’ most senior commentators, takes pro-peak oil man Professor James Hamilton on in a recent article. Professor Hamilton had argued that $100 oil is here to stay, but John Kemp found holes in his thesis.

“If oil wells were not extremely profitable, North Dakota and Texas would not be experiencing a drilling boom, with demand for both rigs and petroleum engineers at the highest level for three decades, said John Kemp in a recent opinion piece.

It’s hard to know who is right, but one thing that John Kemp said is surely up for further examination. Mr Kemp has criticised Professor Hamilton’s assertion that most new oil discovered is of lower quality. Mr Kemp says this isn’t so.

To me, this seems part right and part wrong, and its the part that’s wrong that is important for the aluminium industry. it’s true that some crudes coming from Eagle Ford and other areas is light and sweet, and this is presenting something of a dilemma to Gulf Coast oil refineries that have geared themselves up for heavy sour oil.

But the biggest field is the Alberta tar sands area, which is producing a heavy sour crude. This crude delivers a discounted blend to the refinery and a better economic equation, and as more pipeline and rail capacity delivers more of this crude to refineries, that’s a bigger problem for aluminium producers. Canadian heavy sour crude produces a coke that is unsuitable for anode manufacture.

We will let the experts argue over who is right and who is wrong. Right now we need to see more anode coke available in the longer term, but that desire is under threat from the vast quantities of heavy sour crude oil from Canada.

Making dollars go further

A recent Wall St Journal article highlighted the value of investment in shale oil and gas in the USA.

According to the article, output of shale oil per rig has been rising by 30%-40% per year since 2012, and by about half that for gas. That means that for every dollar of investment, the outputs have been improving constantly. What’s more, a large chunk of the money invested in shale oil plays has been invested into purchasing land, meaning it’s a one-time spend per rig.

Why is this important? Between 2006 and 2012, almost US$1 trillion has been invested into the recent explosion in shale oil and gas. But the WSJ sees no looming credit crisis - with much of the debt not maturing until 2018.

Too much oil is not necessarily a good thing

The United States is finding itself in a strange situation, where the bounty of so much unconventional crude oil is not yet manifesting itself at the refineries.

Simply put, US refineries, especially those in the Gulf Coast are better suited for the heavier, more sour crudes from places such as Mexico and Venezuela.

The U.S. hasn’t built a new oil refinery in at least 30 years, and the existing fleet in many cases reconfigured their plants to cope with the more heavy sour crudes that have been available in the international market. But the crude oil from places such as Eagle Ford in Texas are creating a problem for those refineries.

We are hearing reports that refineries are now spending capital on a “first wave” of modifications - mods which will bring quick returns for low investment. The next wave requires much larger investment and therefore a greater level of confidence that the shale boom and its flood of light sweet crude will continue for the full investment horizon.

Valero, which processes about 2.4 million barrels per day of crude across 10 refineries in North America, is gradually processing more light U.S. crude. The firm plans to spend about $750 million on two new refineries that will better handle oil from the Eagle Ford field.

“What you’re seeing is that as more of this light crude becomes available, there’s plenty of ability for North American Refineries to process it,” a spokesman for Valero told CNBC. He added that the company now processes about 50 percent light sweet crude, up from 1/3 just five years ago.

“Valero’s Gulf Coast refineries have stopped importing light sweet crude internationally because there is so much available domestically,” he added.

US takes the crude crown

The USA is now the world’s largest oil and natural gas liquids producer.

US crude oil and natural gas liquids production surpassed all other countries, with daily output exceeding 11 million barrels during the first five months of this year.

Texas and North Dakota lead the way

The IEA has reported US production of 8.4 million barrels per day (bpd) of oil in April 2014, the highest monthly production volume in 27 years. Texas and North Dakota accounted for nearly half of this total.

Texas hit over 3.0 million bpd for the first time since the late 1970s, more than doubling production in the past three years. North Dakota production reached 1.0 million bpd for the first time in the state’s history, nearly tripling production over the last three years.

Since 2010, the combined output from North Dakota and Texas increased from 26% to 48% of total USA production. In contrast, the Gulf of Mexico’s share declined from 27% to 17%.

According to the IEA, gains in Texas crude oil production came primarily from unconventional tight oil and shale reservoirs in the Eagle Ford Shale in the Western Gulf Basin in West Texas. North Dakota’s increased production came primarily from the Bakken shale formation in the Williston Basin.

Since April 2011, the Eagle Ford has seen the largest average monthly production increase, exceeding 32 000 bpd, more than twice the 14 000 bpd increase in the Permian. Production from the Bakken increased 19 000 bpd on average each month over the same period.

 

Not just the USA..

Here is an article from Seeking Alpha, the investment advisory website, regarding the development of shale oil in Russia - or rather the lack of development to date.

For the past few years, one of the headline stories in many energy blogs, articles, and even the mainstream media has been the rise of North American shale oil production. This method of oil production, properly termed tight oil extraction, relies on using hydraulic fracturing techniques to extract light crude oil from formations of shale rock. The rise of production in shale oil has brought prosperity to such regions as the Bakken Shale in Montana and North Dakota, the Niobrara Formation in Colorado, Nebraska, Kansas, and Wyoming, and the Barnett and Eagle Ford Shale in Texas. These formations and others in the United States contain enormous quantities of oil, so much so that the development of these resources is expected to turn the United States into a net exporter of oil by 2030. In 2013, the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimated that these deposits and other tight oil deposits in the United States contain a total of 58 billion barrels of oil.

However, there is another tight oil play located outside of the United States that greatly eclipses all of these. That deposit is known as the Bazenhov Shale. The Bazenhov is located in West Siberia in Russia, approximately 2,000 miles to the east of the Russian capital of Moscow. The overall region covered by the formation is quite extensive, including much of Western Siberia and even extending to as far north as the Kara Sea and Novaya Zemlya.

(click to enlarge)

Source: Wikipedia repost of an image originally from the United States Geologic Survey

The Bazenhov Formation formed from an extensive sea that existed in the area during the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods. This is the period when paleontologists believe that the largest of the dinosaurs lived on the Earth. At its greatest extent, this prehistoric sea covered more than one million square kilometers and over the course of its several million-year existence it deposited numerous trace minerals and organic materials into the organic-rich siliceous shales located on the seafloor. Over time, these organic materials eventually turned into crude oil and remained deposited inside the shales.

The sheer quantity of oil that is estimated to be contained inside of the Bazenhov Shale is nothing short of astonishing. Unfortunately, the estimates of its size also span quite a wide range. According to Wood Mackenzie, one of the most respected research and consulting firms in the energy and mining industry, the Bazenhov Shale formation contains approximately two trillion barrels of oil in place. The U.S. EIA estimates that the Bazenhov Shale contains 1,243 billion barrels (1.2 trillion barrels) of oil with 74.6 billion barrels of this total being technically recoverable using today’s technology. The Russian government agency Rosendra (Russian Federal Subsoil Agency) estimated in 2012 that the Bazenhov Shale formation contains from 180 to 360 billion barrels of recoverable oil. Finally, the Russian oil company Rosneft (OTC:OJSCY) estimated that the formation contains a mere 22 billion barrels of oil. Rosneft’s estimate, by far the lowest of the group, is still enough to make this formation the equal of the Bakken Shale in the United States. All the other estimates make the formation several times the size of all the tight oil formations in the United States combined. Clearly, this is a resource that neither the oil and gas industry nor investors should ignore.

The Bazenhov Shale is not as developed as the tight oil plays in the United States are. In fact, for the most part, it is not developed at all. One reason for the lack of development here was due to Russia’s oil taxation regime. According to Tom Reed, former CEO of Ruspetro (OTC:RUSPF) who was interviewed for an article in the September 26, 2013 issue of the Financial Times,

“of every $110 of Urals crude, producers pay about $55 in oil export duty and $23 in mineral extraction tax, leaving revenue of just $22 per barrel.”

As I discussed in a recent article on Ruspetro, it is significantly more expensive to extract oil from tight oil formations such as the Bazenhov shale or other shale formations than it is to produce oil conventionally. This factor makes Russia’s high tax regime, which worked fine when levied on the nation’s conventional oil production, a significant handicap for the development of the Bazenhov. In fact, this tax rate makes the development of this tremendously large resource uneconomical given current oil prices.

However, the Russian government is determined to change this. In July 2013, Russian President Vladimir Putin approved a law that would significantly reduce the nation’s Mineral Extraction Tax on oil resources extracted from low permeability formations such as oil shale. The Mineral Extraction Tax is one of two taxes that the nation applies to wellhead revenue, or on revenue that is brought in before an exploration and production company is even able to pay its expenses. Therefore, the reduction of this tax will increase the amount of revenue that an oil company actually realizes from every barrel of oil that the company extracts from the ground. This move significantly changes the economics of Russian shale oil.

Moves such as this one show the Russian government’s dedication to increasing the nation’s shale oil production. One reason why the government is doing this is because the nation’s conventional oil production is declining. In 2010, the Russian energy ministry warned that the nation’s oil production could fall from 10.1 million barrels per day in 2010 to 7.7 million barrels per day in 2020. This scenario, if it plays out, could have significant negative effects on the nation’s government revenues as Russia is quite dependent on its oil revenues as a source of funds for the government. The development of the nation’s resources is also a vital part of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s strategy to expand the nation’s international influence and so encouraging the development of the Bazenhov would also be an important part of this long-term plan.

Shenhua taking a US Shale 101 class

A recent article about China Shenhua Energy, the world’s second largest coal company, says they are planning to create a JV between a U.S. subsidiary and a private Pennsylvania natural gas producer to drill 25 natural gas wells in the US and in the meantime, learn how to tap into natural gas embedded in shale.

China has more abundant supplies of shale gas than shale oil, so they have good reason to learn how to tap into this natural resource.

It is another example of the Chinese learning for themselves. While foreign money and technology is always welcome, those are a means to a greater end for China. China always wants these things for itself, as any country does, but in China’s case, companies such as this have the means to go out and learn for themselves. There is no doubt they have the full blessing from Beijing.

Wonder if there will be any resistance in the USA to a Chinese company taking a role in the supply of energy…

Welcome to the Crude Revolution

Welcome to AZ China’s newest service - the Crude Revolution blog.

This blog will be paying close attention to the tight oil and shale oil phenomenon in the USA, and its impact on the aluminium industry. Shale oil is already affecting the production of petroleum coke in the Gulf coast - both the volume and the quality is shifting, and is set to shift further in the months and years to come.

This blog will provide you with the latest news and opinions in the carbon and anode world.

Our sister blog, the Black China Blog, will continue to report on China’s and the world’s aluminium industry and market, and will also cover areas such as the political environment in China. We will keep stories “cross-fertilised” for the time being.

As always with AZ China’s products and services, we welcome your feedback and comments.