RUSAL joins CNIA

UC Rusal has become a member of the China Nonferrous Industry Association (CNIA), according to a press release today.

It had previously been reported that Rusal’s president Oleg Deripasky had been in Beijing last week for a meeting with the CNIA. But this move was not mentioned in those stories. The press release gives virtually no details of how Rusal met membership criteria, since Rusal owns no smelting assets inside China (plenty across the border of course.)

It’s an unusual move, and I went so far as to describe it as “hopeful” to the Reuters Metal Bulletin reporter who rang me for comment.

CNIA is a government entity. Industry associations in China do not operate in the way we are used to in other countries. Although the CNIA supports industry initiatives, its primary role is the roll-out and execution of government policy. It may seem a little bit of an overkill to set up an industry association for an industry with fewer than 70 entities (which together own about 130 smelters.) But think in terms of steel, where there are thousands of proprietors, and you begin to understand why the government makes use of industry associations. It is also a throwback to the 1990s, when the aluminium industry was entirely government-owned.

To understand the work of the CNIA, recall who it was that led the closure of all China’s Soderberg lines in 2004 and 2005.

Since Rusal has no assets in China (they own 2 cathode plants and a JV with a metals trader), it is hard to understand how they qualified.

And if Rusal expects a “leg up” in promoting sales of metal from their plants into China via the CNIA, it seems a long stretch, from what I can see. In the first place, we have local and provincial governments propping up the industry, keeping smelters open and even funding the re-start of additional capacity, all of which keeps China over-supplied. Second, the last major Sino-Russian deal was the crude oil pipeline, where China has short-changed Russia to the point that the Russian President came to Beijing to complain. Third, it has been a long time since the Chinese took advice from any foreigners, much less the Russians.

To the best of my knowledge, no other foreign companies are members of the CNIA. Alcan may have been, for the short while that they owned their Ningxia plant. Alcoa had a small interest in the Chalco Ping Guo plant some years ago, and now have their strategic alliance with CPIC, but I never hear Alcoa talking about being a member.

But to turn this thing full circle, CNIA is a member of the IAI (IAI’s China production figures come from the CNIA), so Rusal may now be an IAI member twice!

Editor’s note - It was Metal Bulletin who called me, not Reuters.

 

Antaike gets it wrong - again

The publishing arm of the China Nonferrous Industry Association (CNIA) is called Antaike. They are technically a “grand-daughter” company of CNIA, with an intermediate company controlling all CNIA’s commercial activities. But their overwhelming allegiance, as with the CNIA, is to government policy.

Unlike industry associations in other countries, here in China they are an arm of government. The government has little ability to directly manage and control industry, but still needs a channel through which to deliver policy and seek execution of those policies and regulations. Although the primary aluminium industry is relatively small, with less than 100 companies owning 128 smelters; consider industries such as the steel industry in which there are thousands of players.

Within the industry itself, these industry associations are seen as good places to send people who can’t cut it at the “coal face”. Executives who have not been able to achieve corporate targets sometimes find themselves “promoted” out of the way, into an industry association. (That’s less true on the technical side, where it is more likely that a technical expert will retire to the industry association where he can still do some good.)

Because of this allegiance to Beijing’s view of the world, CNIA and Antaike sometimes get things wrong. CNIA for instance, does not include certain smelters in their monthly production figures for China. They simply refuse to recognise smelters that do not have full Beijing approval for their construction or operation. Weiqiao smelter is one example, with almost 1 million tonnes of production simply missing from CNIA’s figures. So how did CNIA fix this, when people started complaining? They stopped issuing detailed lists.

So it comes as no surprise when Antaike’s monthly report includes this gem:

Dongxing Special Aluminum Alloy Co., Ltd. … on December 26 put its newly-built stage 1 primary aluminum project with a designed capacity of 450 ktpy into production. The company adopts 500 KA pre-baked technology for the project. It is the largest potline in the world’s aluminum industry.”

Antaike should know that Chalco already has a 500ka potline in existence, which has been running for almost 12 months now. It should also know that RTA is building a 600ka line in Quebec Canada, although to be fair, that line isn’t running yet.

It is a small example, but there are simply too many occurring too often. It is no wonder that Antaike has become a great place for others to poach good people. Recently, a major international aluminium company succeeded in taking one of Antaike’s better people. That follows people such as Wan Ling, widely regarded as one of the best aluminium analysts, who left Antaike for CRU.

Why am I picking on Antaike? Because too many analysts and consultants, especially outside China, rely on them for information about China’s aluminium industry. One should be able to rely on a government company as a bastion of reliability, but Antaike is a long way from being able to claim that.

Antaike getting their act together… a little

Antaike, the publishing arm of China Nonferrous Industry Association (CNIA) held their annual aluminium conference last week, in the seaside town of Zhuhai. Zhuhai is a favorite town for Communist Party cadres for their annual vacation, since it sits right next to Macao.

Antaike has been notorious for their poor planning of conferences. They want to get more foreign company representatives, but every year they delay the announcement of the date and location of the aluminium conference until just a couple of months out. Since it is held at the end of each year, most foreign businessmen and women have long since used up their annual travel and conference budget, and are often trying to complete their targets for the end of the year. Having to change plans at make a trip to China is not always possible. Hence at last week’s conference, where more than 500 delegates registered, only 85 foreign representatives made it along.

But it seems that Antaike have maybe finally learned a lesson. They have already announced that the 2012 conference will be held in Chongqing the last week of November. Finally we can all plan well ahead. Presumably they will get a higher ratio of “lao wai” (Chinese for foreigner) at their next conference.

That still leaves plenty of room for other improvements. Last week, the check-in process was abysmal. It took us 1 hour to get from the front door of the hotel to our rooms. Some of the papers were atrocious, or simply not relevant, or presented wrong data. And their time keeping left a lot to be desired. Hopefully one day Antaike will fix these problems and make the event more worth attending.

Who knows, maybe one day they will even move to improve the quality of the data they publish. Since they are an arm of the Government, they have no choice but to present the official numbers. In the case of aluminium production for instance, they numbers were out by over 1 million tonnes last year, and this year will be about the same. Is it any wonder some analysts sitting outside China get their forecasts completely wrong.

May aluminium production at new record high

China’s National Bureau of Statistics today published its version of the production figures for May.

According to the NBS, May saw 1.536 million tonnes produced, for a daily rate of 49,500 tonne.

That easily exceeds the previous high, set only last month, and pushes the industry closer to our expected annual production target. This daily rate represents 18 million tonnes annualised. Our forecast is for 18.5 million tonnes.

However strong this may seem, it is still only 8% higher than May 2010. On a year to date basis, 2011 is running only 2.8% higher than 2010. With GDP running at 9% plus, and with most of aluminium’s key markets all growing at similar rates, it is no surprise to see Shanghai inventories falling and metal prices rising.

This figure also comes at a time when some smelters are facing power shortages, either as a result of a shortage of coal at power stations or because drought has affected hydroelectric power supply.

For more information about China’s short-term future in relation to aluminium and electricity supply, contact AZ China.

Next week we will see the CNIA data for May, which is usually a little more reliable than NBS - though still not complete.

New record for aluminium production

According to China’s National Bureau of Statistics, April’s production of primary aluminium came in at 1.459 million tonnes, for an average daily rate of 48,600 tonnes.

That compares to March when the daily rate was 46,100 tonnes, and is a step above the previous record rate set in June 2010, at 47,500 tonnes.

The NBS numbers come out a bit too early to be accurate, and we know that they sometimes miss some smelters, so it will be interesting to see what the CNIA reports in a week’s time.

So far this year, based on this latest figure, China has produced 5.5 million tonnes. They are well on target to meet our forecast for 2011 of 18.5 - 19 million tonnes.

The big question is, where is all this metal going? Part of the answer will be in the Import/Export figures when they come out. The figures to the end of March indicate that primary imports had been more than covered by exports of alloyed metal, while imports of scrap metal were more than double exports of semis, for a net balance of 235,000t of imports. With the LME sitting well above SHFE through April, it’s hard to see that much metal will be imported into China, even on a turnaround basis.

The most remarkable part of the puzzle is that the metal price remains in positive territory, relative to the cash cost of production, despite record production levels and high imports.

Subscribers to our Black China Reports will get more information on these questions.